Standard vs. Modular Sampling: Best Practices for Reliable LLM Unlearning 文章

ArXiv CS.AI2026-06-08NEWSen作者: Praveen Bushipaka, Lucia Passaro, Tommaso Cucinotta

详细信息

来源站点
ArXiv CS.AI
作者
Praveen Bushipaka, Lucia Passaro, Tommaso Cucinotta
文章类型
NEWS
语言
en
发布日期
2026-06-08

摘要

arXiv:2509.05316v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: A conventional LLM Unlearning setting consists of two subsets -"forget" and "retain", with the objectives of removing the undesired knowledge from the forget set while preserving the remaining knowledge from the retain. In privacy-focused unlearning research, a retain set is often further divided into neighbor sets, containing either directly or indirectly connected to the forget targets; and augmented by a general-knowledge set. A common practice in existing benchmarks is to employ only a single neighbor set, with general knowledge which fails to reflect the real-world data complexities and relationships. LLM Unlearning typically involves 1:1 sampling or cyclic iteration sampling. However, the efficacy and stability of these de facto standards have not been critically examined. In this study, we systematically evaluate these common practices.

相关事件

暂无数据

相关公司

暂无数据

相关人物

暂无数据

相关产品

暂无数据