详细信息
- 来源站点
- ArXiv CS.CL
- 作者
- William Lugoloobi, Thomas Foster, William Bankes, Chris Russell
- 文章类型
- PAPER
- 语言
- en
- 发布日期
- 2026-08-12
摘要
arXiv:2602.09924v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Running LLMs with extended reasoning on every problem is expensive, but determining which inputs actually require additional compute remains challenging. We investigate whether their own likelihood of success is recoverable from their internal representations before generation, and if this signal can guide more efficient inference. We train linear probes on pre-generation activations to predict policy-specific success on math and coding tasks, substantially outperforming surface features such as question length and TF-IDF. Using E2H-AMC, which provides both human and model performance on identical problems, we show that models encode a model-specific notion of difficulty that is distinct from human difficulty, and that this distinction increases with extended reasoning.