详细信息
- 来源站点
- ArXiv CS.CL
- 作者
- Jian Lu, Panyu Chen, Miriam Treggiari, Robert Blessing, Danyang Zhuo, Chunhua Weng, William W. Stead, Anru R. Zhang
- 文章类型
- PAPER
- 语言
- en
- 发布日期
- 2026-07-28
摘要
arXiv:2607.22954v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Objective: To characterize the kinds of internal documentation inconsistencies a general-domain large language model (LLM) can surface from real-world discharge summaries, and to identify recurring failure modes that limit reliability at scale. Materials and Methods: We applied a two-stage LLM pipeline---open-ended candidate identification (Gemini 2.5 Pro) followed by context-grounded verification (Gemini 2.5 Flash)---to 3,000 randomly sampled MIMIC-IV-Note discharge summaries. A subset of the pipeline output was then reviewed manually by clinical experts. Results: Our pipeline surfaced 3,460 candidate inconsistencies, affecting 69.7% of admissions. Representative examples spanned demographics, allergies, procedures, diagnoses, laboratory, medications, and care-planning domains, with direct implications for clinical reasoning or patient safety.