Corruption in Economic Development: Beneficial Grease, Minor Annoyance, or Major Obstacle? 论文

1999World Bank policy research working paper引用 228
Corruption and Economic DevelopmentEconomic Growth and DevelopmentGlobal Financial Crisis and Policies

摘要

No AccessPolicy Research Working Papers25 Jun 2013Corruption in Economic Development: Beneficial Grease, Minor Annoyance, or Major Obstacle?Authors/Editors: Shang-Jin WeiShang-Jin Weihttps://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-2048SectionsAboutPDF (0.1 MB) ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In Abstract:February 1999 Corruption is a major obstacle to economic development. It reduces domestic investment, discourages foreign direct investment, inflates government spending, and shifts government spending away from education, health, and infrastructure maintenance toward less efficient (more manipulable) public projects. International pressure against corruption is useful, but more critical is reform of domestic institutions and a focus on the incentive problem. Abuse of power by public officials should not pay. Wei reviews the overwhelming statistical evidence that countries with high levels of corruption experience poor economic performance. Corruption hinders economic development by reducing domestic investment, discouraging foreign direct investment, encouraging overspending in government, and distorting the composition of government spending (away from education, health, and infrastructure maintenance toward less efficient but more manipulable public projects). The World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, among others, define corruption as the abuse of public office for private gains. Whenever a public office is abused, a public function or objective is set aside and compromised. Only if a public function is unproductive are policy goals unharmed by corruption. But one often hears that bribery greases the machinery of commerce, so Wei studied the evidence-which clearly rejects that hypothesis. Culture shapes the difference between a bribe and a gift but culturally induced differences seem small. There is no evidence to support the notion that corruption in Asia, including East Asia, entails lesser consequences. Corruption can be symptomatic of many social ills so the fight against it must be multifaceted. Laws and law enforcement are indispensable, but countries serious about fighting corruption should also reform government's role in the economy, especially in areas that (by giving officials discretionary power) are hotbeds of corruption. Recruiting and promoting civil servants on the basis of merit and paying them a salary competitive with similar jobs in the private sector helps attract moral, high-quality civil servants. International pressure on corrupt countries, and also to criminalize the bribing of foreign officials by multinational firms, can be useful. But anti-corruption campaigns cannot succeed without reforming domestic institutions in the corrupt countries. This paper-a product of Public Economics, Development Research Group-is part of a larger effort in the group to study questions on accountability and governance. The author may be contacted at [email protected] Previous bookNext book FiguresReferencesRecommendedDetailsCited ByEconomic and Institutional Determinants of Corruption: The Case of Developed and Developing CountriesJournal of Economics and Finance, Vol.76 August 2022A systematic review of digital technology and innovation and its potential to address anti-corruption, transparency, and accountability in the pharmaceutical supply chainExpert Opinion on Drug Safety, Vol.21, No.828 June 2022Erosion of State Power, Corruption Control and Fiscal CapacityThe Economic Journal, Vol.132, No.6447 September 2021Does Perceived Corruption Converge? International EvidenceEconomics, Vol.16, No.117 March 2022Arab-German Trade and Institutions: The Effect of Good Governance on Arab Exports to GermanyThe European Journal of Development Research, Vol.9110 September 2021Friend or foe? Social ties in bribery and corruptionExperimental Economics, Vol.24, No.312 October 2020On the Nexus Between Institutions and Economic Development: An Empirical Analysis for Sub-Saharan African CountriesThe European Journal of Development Research, Vol.516 August 2021Viewing Cancer Through the Lens of Corruption: Using Behavioral Ecology to Understand CancerFrontiers in Ecology and Evolution, Vol.98 July 2021The impact of corruption, economic freedom, regulation and transparency on bank profitability and bank stability: Evidence from the Eurozone areaJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol.184Corruption monitoring and the supply of politicians in ChinaGovernance, Vol.34, No.121 February 2020The Role of Tax Systems in Preventing CorruptionLeaving the Barracks: Military Coups in Developing DemocraciesPolitics & Policy, Vol.48, No.63 November 2020Gender Heterogeneity of Bureaucrats in Attitude to Corruption: Evidence From List ExperimentSSRN Electronic Journal, Vol.89İktisadi Büyüme ve Yolsuzluk İlişkisi: Türkiye için Ampirik Bir İncelemeUluslararası Ekonomi ve Yenilik Dergisi, Vol.6, No.229 October 2019Firm Growth and Corruption: Empirical Evidence from VietnamThe Economic Journal, Vol.129, No.61817 October 2017Quantification of corruption in preventative cost-based S-LCA: a contribution to the Oiconomy projectThe International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol.24, No.16 September 2018Institutional quality, natural resources and FDI: empirical evidence from PakistanEurasian Business Review, Vol.8, No.425 October 2017Do infrastructure and quality of governance matter for manufacturing productivity? Empirical evidence from the Indian statesJournal of Economic Studies, Vol.45, No.4Administrative Processes as an Anti-Corruption Tool? A View from Public Employees in the Baltic StatesBaltic Journal of Law & Politics, Vol.11, No.129 October 2018A synthetic indicator of corruption for Latin America: a global visionCompetitiveness Review, Vol.28, No.2Implementing the 2030 Agenda in Pakistan: The Critical Role of an Enabling Environment In the Mobilisation of Domestic and External ResourcesSSRN Electronic JournalEconomic Analysis, No.27(3)Foreign direct investment (FDI) and corruption: Is it a major hindrance for encouraging inward FDI?African Journal of Business Management, Vol.10, No.1028 May 2016Goal integration through transformational leadershipJournal of Global Responsibility, Vol.7, No.1Does Political Corruption Impede Firm Innovation? Evidence from the United StatesSSRN Electronic JournalThe Great Wall of Debt: The Cross Section of Chinese Local Government Credit SpreadsSSRN Electronic JournalPolitical Corruption and Its Cost in Kazakhstan: Policy Analysis ExcerciseSSRN Electronic JournalDoes the WTO help member states improve governance?World Trade Review, Vol.13, No.317 October 2013CORRUPTION'S DIRECT EFFECTS ON PER-CAPITA INCOME GROWTH: A META-ANALYSISJournal of Economic Surveys, Vol.28, No.312 June 2013Political Corruption in the Age of Transnational CapitalismHistorical Materialism, Vol.22, No.1The Determinants of Corruption: Cross-Country-Panel-Data AnalysisThe Developing Economies, Vol.50, No.419 November 2012Should One Hire a Corrupt CEO in a Corrupt Country?SSRN Electronic JournalDoes Increased Civil Service Pay Deter Corruption?: Evidence from ChinaSSRN Electronic JournalThe Institutional Roots of Anti-Corruption Policies: Comparing the Three Baltic StatesJournal of Baltic Studies, Vol.42, No.3The Politics of Public Health Aid: Why Corrupt Governments Have Incentives to Implement Aid EffectivelyWorld Development, Vol.39, No.1Does the WTO Help Member States Clean Up?SSRN Electronic JournalUnderstanding corruption and firm responses in cross-national firm-level surveysJournal of International Business Studies, Vol.41, No.920 May 2010ICTD state of the union: Where have we reached and where are we headedCitizen Views of Globalization and State Governance in KoreaInternational Area Review, Vol.11, No.21 September 2008Corruption, legal solutions and limits of lawInternational Journal of Law in Context, Vol.3, No.312 November 2007An efficiency and welfare classification of rationing by waiting in the presence of briberyJournal of Development Economics, Vol.83, No.2Corruption, firm growth and export propensity in KenyaInternational Journal of Social Economics, Vol.34, No.3Funding and managing agricultural research in a developing countryInternational Journal of Social Economics, Vol.33, No.4Indonesian Financial Crisis Evidence: Bonding Mechanism of Free Cash Flow to Financial PerformanceSSRN Electronic JournalSyndromes of Corruption, Vol.11622 September 2009What Drives Infrastructure Spending in Cities of Developing Countries?Urban Studies, Vol.42, No.82 July 2016Explaining Patterns of Corruption in the Russian RegionsWorld Politics, Vol.57, No.413 June 2011State Regulations, Job Search and Wage Bargaining: A Study in the Economics of the Informal SectorSSRN Electronic JournalCorruption in Public Service Delivery: Experience from South Asia's Water and Sanitation SectorWorld Development, Vol.32, No.1Street-level corruption in industrialized and developing countriesEuropean Societies, Vol.5, No.2State Power and Private Profit: the political economy of corruption in Southeast AsiaAsian-Pacific Economic Literature, Vol.16, No.2The causes of corruption: a cross-national studyJournal of Public Economics, Vol.76, No.3Measuring Governance and State Capture: The Role of Bureaucrats and Firms in Shaping the Business EnvironmentSSRN Electronic Journal View Published: November 1999 Copyright & Permissions Related RegionsEast Asia & PacificRelated CountriesSingaporeUnited StatesRelated TopicsFinance and Financial Sector DevelopmentLaw and DevelopmentPoverty ReductionSocial Development KeywordsABUSEANTI-CORRUPTIONBANKBRIBEBRIBERYCIVIL SERVANTSCORRUPTCORRUPTIONFIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTIONGOVERNANCEGOVERNMENTINTEGRITYLAWLAW ENFORCEMENTLAWSMULTINATIONALORGANIZATIONPOLICYPRIVATE GAINSTRANSPARENCY PDF DownloadLoading ...

相关技术

暂无数据

相关事件

暂无数据

相关文章

暂无数据