CONTEXTUALISM, SUBJECT-SENSITIVE INVARIANTISM AND KNOWLEDGE OF KNOWLEDGE 论文

2005The Philosophical Quarterly引用 329
Epistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge

详细信息

发表期刊/会议
The Philosophical Quarterly
发表日期
2005-04-01
发表年份
2005

关键词

Epistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge

摘要

§I schematises the evidence for an understanding of ‘know ’ and other terms of epistemic appraisal that embodies contextualism or subject-sensitive invariantism, and distinguishes between those two approaches. §II argues that although the cases for contextualism and sensitive invariantism rely on a principle of charity in the interpretation of epistemic claims, neither approach satisfies charity fully, since both attribute metalinguistic errors to speakers. §III provides an equally charitable anti-sceptical insensitive invariantist explanation of much of the same evidence as the result of psychological bias caused by salience effects. §IV suggests that the explanation appears to have implausible consequences about practical reasoning, but also that applications of contextualism or sensitive invariantism to the problem of scepticism have such consequences. §V argues that the inevitable difference between appropriateness and knowledge of appropriateness in practical reasoning, closely related to the difference between knowledge and knowledge of knowledge, explains the apparent implausibility.

相关技术

暂无数据

相关事件

暂无数据

相关文章

暂无数据