An Empirical Analysis of Phishing Blacklists 论文

2018Research Showcase @ Carnegie Mellon University (Carnegie Mellon University)引用 340
Spam and Phishing DetectionUser Authentication and Security SystemsInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting

详细信息

发表期刊/会议
Research Showcase @ Carnegie Mellon University (Carnegie Mellon University)
发表日期
2018-06-29
发表年份
2018

关键词

Spam and Phishing DetectionUser Authentication and Security SystemsInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting

摘要

In this paper, we study the effectiveness of phishing blacklists. We used 191 fresh phish that were less than 30 minutes old to conduct two tests on eight anti-phishing toolbars. We found that 63% of the phishing campaigns in our dataset lasted less than two hours. Blacklists were ineffective when protecting users initially, as most of them caught less than 20% of phish at hour zero. We also found that blacklists were updated at different speeds, and varied in coverage, as 47% - 83% of phish appeared on blacklists 12 hours from the initial test. We found that two tools using heuristics to complement blacklists caught significantly more phish initially than those using only blacklists. However, it took a long time for phish detected by heuristics to appear on blacklists. Finally, we tested the toolbars on a set of 15,345 legitimate URLs for false positives, and did not find any instance of mislabeling for either blacklists or heuristics. We present these findings and discuss ways in which anti-phishing tools can be improved.