Development and Validation of Two Instruments Measuring Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load 论文

详细信息

发表期刊/会议

Frontiers in Psychology

发表日期

2017-11-16

发表年份

2017

摘要

= between 65 and 95 for each task), we improved the instrument for the naïve rating. For each study, we analyzed whether the instruments are reliable and valid, for Study 1, we also checked for comparability of the two measurement strategies. In Study 2, we conducted a simultaneous scenario based factor analysis. The informed rating seems to be a promising strategy to assess the different aspects of cognitive load, but it seems not economic and feasible for larger studies and a standardized training would be necessary. The improved version of the naïve rating turned out to be a useful, feasible, and reliable instrument. Ongoing studies analyze the conceptual validity of this measurement with up to now promising results.