A survey on addressing high-class imbalance in big data 论文

2018Journal Of Big Data引用 746顶会
Imbalanced Data Classification TechniquesElectricity Theft Detection TechniquesFinancial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction

详细信息

发表期刊/会议
Journal Of Big Data
发表日期
2018-11-01
发表年份
2018

关键词

Imbalanced Data Classification TechniquesElectricity Theft Detection TechniquesFinancial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction

摘要

In a majority–minority classification problem, class imbalance in the dataset(s) can dramatically skew the performance of classifiers, introducing a prediction bias for the majority class. Assuming the positive (minority) class is the group of interest and the given application domain dictates that a false negative is much costlier than a false positive, a negative (majority) class prediction bias could have adverse consequences. With big data, the mitigation of class imbalance poses an even greater challenge because of the varied and complex structure of the relatively much larger datasets. This paper provides a large survey of published studies within the last 8 years, focusing on high-class imbalance (i.e., a majority-to-minority class ratio between 100:1 and 10,000:1) in big data in order to assess the state-of-the-art in addressing adverse effects due to class imbalance. In this paper, two techniques are covered which include Data-Level (e.g., data sampling) and Algorithm-Level (e.g., cost-sensitive and hybrid/ensemble) Methods. Data sampling methods are popular in addressing class imbalance, with Random Over-Sampling methods generally showing better overall results. At the Algorithm-Level, there are some outstanding performers. Yet, in the published studies, there are inconsistent and conflicting results, coupled with a limited scope in evaluated techniques, indicating the need for more comprehensive, comparative studies.