摘要
arXiv:2605.29240v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI-augmented classrooms generate rich teacher and student feedback before graded outcomes become available, yet these signals can be difficult to translate into timely instructional decisions. We propose an interpretable decision layer: a transparent mechanism that ranks course topics requiring attention without using grades or post-hoc outcome labels. The approach combines three signals: student learning difficulty prevalence, disagreement between learner self-reports and observed difficulties, and unresolved teacher concerns. The output is a ranked set of topic priorities with per-topic decision records explaining each ranking. In one graduate CS course offering ($n=5$ instructor interviews; $n=279$ survey responses), prioritized topics aligned with instructor concerns (top-5 overlap 3/5; Spearman $\rho=0.80$) and student-reported topic difficulty ($\rho=0.46$, $p=.048$).
相关事件查看全部 (1)
相关公司
暂无数据
相关人物
暂无数据
相关产品
暂无数据
相关技术
暂无数据